Not that I'm a genius or anything. (Well, I am, but genius is only as good as the available information.) Dafydd ap Hugh at Big Lizards looks at why Andrew Breitbart's $10K offer was a brilliant move: Big Lizards:Blog:Entry “The Cleaver Conundrum - and the Brilliance of Breitbart's Bucks”
The easy (and correct) conclusion is that the incidident never happened; that's why no journalist claims he heard it. But this begs a most intriguing question: Why not? Why hasn't some left-leaning journalist present at the scene stepped forward and claimed he heard the N-word, even if he has to lie about it?
One would think it would be the easiest thing in the world for two or three or ten reporters simply to fib, to back up the Democrats and tar the entire Tea-Party popular front with the vile epithet "racist." The leftstream media is certainly no stranger to tendentious lying to make the political Left look good; they do it all the time. What could a new "Jayson Blair" possibly have to lose?
The answer is -- his freedom; and therein lies the genius of Andrew Breitbart.
By making his $100,000 offer, Breitbart has changed the game: He singlehandedly elevated the consequences for lying about the alleged incident from simple embarassment if caught, or even a job loss (usually temporary) -- to felony fraud.
Now if some reporter for the New York Times or the Washington Post or CBS News tells the big lie, casting it as his "personal eyewitness testimony," he can be arrested for fraudulently trying to obtain the hundred thousand dollar bounty. And considering the wealth of negative evidence from videotape, audiotape, and hundreds of Tea Partiers and even other reporters, any earwitness thinking of backing up the CBC's fabrication must weigh the possibility that he himself will end up in prison.
Thus is the power of positive bounty... a ton of money makes a federal case out of simple character assassination!
No comments:
Post a Comment