Tuesday, March 15, 2005

Wall Street Journal has a review of the works of H.P. Lovecraft. Lovecraft's shadow looms over modern horror fiction the way the shadows of decrepit churches and mutant trees – and the occasional eidolon loomed over the characters in his novels.

As with so much genre fiction, Lovecraft's oeuvre isn't for everyone. Some people just can't see past the wooden characters, overwrought prose, and fantastic speculations about the nature of the universe. The dialogue occasionally descends into Howard Dean-like howls of "Eh-ya-ya-ya-yahaah!" Edmund Wilson once quipped that the only horror in Lovecraft's corpus was the author's "bad taste and bad art." Yet it is difficult to deny his enormous importance in a field of literature whose roots stretch back to the Gothic novels of Anne Radcliffe, the prescient nightmares of Mary Shelley, and the macabre mind of Edgar Allan Poe. Even the most respectable authors have taken advantage of the conventions these writers created and refined. "The Turn of the Screw" by Henry James, after all, is a pretty good ghost story.

And indeed, Lovecraft's work has spawned (if I may use the word) any number of books, movies, TV shows, and even the odd (!) role-playing game.

There's something about being scared, and when Lovecraft was good, he was pretty darn good.

Yet Lovecraft's circle seems ready for ever more widening. On the Internet, it's possible to take a virtual tour of Lovecraft sites in his hometown of Providence, R.I., or to shop for a Cthulhu plush toy. You can also buy a bumper sticker: "Cthulhu for President--Don't settle for the lesser evil." Lovecraft almost never wrote a happy ending and he certainly isn't known for his sense of humor, but perhaps by now even he would appreciate that it's nice to have the last laugh.

And it seems when he's bad, he's even better.

No comments: