Lets face it: would you expect Soon and Monckton to write a paper on ‘Why climate models run cold’. Or Jim Hansen to write a paper saying that human caused climate change is not dangerous. People that have a dog in the fight (reputational, financial, ideological, political) interpret observations to fit a particular idea, that supports their particular ‘dog.’ The term ‘motivated reasoning’ is usually reserved for political motivations, but preserving your reputation or funding is probably more likely to be a motivator among scientists.
Saturday, May 16, 2015
Tackling human biases in science | Climate Etc.
Tackling human biases in science | Climate Etc.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment