From This Ain't Hell blog, Unanswered Questions About Repealing Don’t Ask Don’t Tell
Lets go over some of the questions that nobody in the Obama administration or Congress has addressed in regards to repealing DADT:
- Will there be seperate barracks, berthing, and living quarters for homosexuals?
- ...Mandating that homosexuals have their own living quarters (like some colleges and universities do) will require new construction of barracks and a complete rearrangement and reconfiguring of hundreds of naval vessels. On the other hand, allowing homosexuals to live with heterosexuals, will cause a whole different set of headaches for military commanders.
- 2. Will homosexuals be allowed to serve in combat arms units?
- Women are forbidden by Congress to serve in combat arms units (infantry, arty, tanks, etc.). Some of the same issues surrounding women serving in combat units are present in the debate over gays serving openly in these same units.
- 3. Will people discharged under DADT be allowed to reenlist/recommission in the military if the policy is repealed?
- I don’t know how many people who were discharged under DADT would want to reenter the military, but there are even more questions that need to be answered if they are allowed to reenter. Will they retain their same rank/billet regardless how long they have been out? Will they get retroactive promotions?
- 4. If homosexuals are allowed to serve openly in the military, will the military recognize and award benefits to gay marriages or civil unions?
- 5. Will each service be allowed to craft its own policies regarding homosexuals?
- 6. How much money is repealing DADT going to cost?
- Everytime the military changes a policy, it costs money.
People may differ over how much of a problem each of these may be, or how concerned the military should be about each item. For example, many will see no problem with recognizing civil unions. I think, all else being equal, why not? I suspect the military takes into account matters like blood relation between brothers and cousins, simply because the brothers and cousins are almost certain to.
(Of course, the comments are open for corrections.)
No comments:
Post a Comment